The Land Forces Bill: When Parliamentary Speed Trumps Citizen Rights

The rushed nature of our laws

In the Legislative Council, we are currently debating the Land Forces Event (Special Powers) Bill. The government tells us this legislation is essential and urgent. Yet, when we dig into the details, the justifications provided are vague. This isn't just bureaucracy: it is a situation where fundamental rights are being treated as secondary to the convenience of a short-term event. As a doctor, I have seen what happens when you treat the symptoms without understanding the cause. Rushing legislation through Parliament without clear, evidence-based reasoning is a diagnostic failure of the highest order.

We are told that the government is striking a balance between public order and personal freedom. However, when we look at the specific powers being granted, it feels more like an encroachment. These laws allow for searches, identification demands, and the potential exclusion of people from public spaces. In my years as a GP, I never saw a patient cured by red tape. Creating such broad, discretionary powers for police creates a climate of uncertainty for ordinary people simply going about their daily lives.

If you care about keeping up to date with the work we are doing to hold the government to account in Parliament, please subscribe to my YouTube channel for regular updates.

Constitutional concerns and the human cost

One of the most alarming aspects of this debate is the cavalier approach to constitutional warnings. We have seen experts from organisations like the Human Rights Law Centre provide evidence that similar laws in other jurisdictions have been found invalid. Despite this, the government pushes on. This creates a real risk: we are potentially codifying laws that fail the basic test of proportionality. It is a sinking feeling to realise that your rights might be suspended because the government refuses to heed the advice of those who understand the law better than anyone.

The human cost is also profound. We asked questions about how this would affect the most vulnerable in our community, including those experiencing homelessness. The answers were less than reassuring. While the government speaks of connecting people to services, there is no guarantee of real, safe accommodation for those forced to move from the event area. We are effectively clearing the streets to create a sanitised zone, ignoring the reality that those individuals remain part of our community.

The danger of setting a precedent

When we allow these special powers to be used for a temporary event, we risk setting a standard that will be used again. Once the genie of expanded state power is out of the bottle, it is incredibly difficult to put it back. The government claims this is a one-off, but we have heard that before. We are watching a slow erosion of civil liberties, justified by the perceived need for security.

The debate around this bill serves as a reminder that we must remain vigilant. While the major parties play politics, we look at the evidence. The people of Western Australia deserve a government that respects the Constitution and the rights of every individual, not one that treats those rights as optional extras.

If you share our commitment to evidence-based policy and protecting our democratic freedoms, I invite you to join Legalise Cannabis WA at this link to help us continue this vital work.